HCMI Client Letter - May 7th, 2004

Dear Clients & Friends, 

 

   
 
The S&P 500 rallied 26.4% in 2003, but 4 months through 2004, the S&P 500 is virtually at break-even, up 0.2% YTD.  Earnings for the first quarter were spectacular (more below), economic reports are solid and the jobs situation is improving, so why isn't the stock market doing better?  This chart shows the S&P 500 in a tight trading range since New Year's:
 
Joy over the improving economic picture is balanced by fears about Iraq and the War on Terror, higher energy and interest rates, and uncertainty about the November Presidential election.   Joy and Fear are equally balanced right now, leading to a 5.6% trading range in the S&P 500, an 11.9% trading range in the NASDAQ.  Day to day volatility has been high, with half of trading days year to date up or down 0.5% or more, but no actual progress has been made.  What will break the deadlock, leading to either higher or lower stock prices?
 
Earnings
We're at the tail end of the first quarter earnings reports, and the numbers have dramatically exceeded expectations.  With 82% of S&P 500 companies reporting, earnings grew 25.8% year over year (double the estimate at the start of the quarter,) and revenues jumped 11.7%.  In the last quarter, earnings grew 28.3% and revenues 10.7%.  With each passing quarter, comparisons become progressively tougher, but overall, earnings should grow in the low teens through the rest of 2004 (all numbers from First Call.) 
 
77% of companies reporting have beaten estimates versus 66% in the previous quarter.  As we commented previously, the application of the Sarbanes-Oxley regulations has incentivized corporate management to low-ball estimates, and also to avoid the accounting gimmicks that tripped up management at WorldCom, Enron, Tyco and Adelphia.  The quality of earnings reported is higher than a few years ago. 
 
Economic Reports
GDP slowed from Q3's blistering 8.2%, maintaining a more sustainable 4.2% rate in Q4 and Q1.  As we see in this chart, the mild recession which began in the last year of the Clinton administration and prevailed through the 9/11 attack, is now well in the rear view mirror.
 
 
In the manufacturing sector, we see higher orders, higher productivity, and higher output, generally outstripping estimates.  In the consumer sector, we see high housing starts and resales, higher retail spending and high consumer confidence.  Personal income is drifting higher, and employment remains below the peak level set in 2000.  However last month's outsize 308,000 (revised upward today to up 337,000) jump in payrolls was followed by today's 288,000 jump in jobs, so the unemployment rate (latest 5.6%) should continue to fall through 2004, despite higher productivity and despite "outsourcing." 
Overall, these reports point to higher stock prices, although today's initial reaction was negative on concerns that the Fed will start raising rates.
 
Interest Rates
In April, long term interest rates jumped dramatically higher, with yields on the 10 year treasury rising from 3.68% in early March, to the current 4.60%.  The Fed Reserve did not change rates at the most recent meeting, but indicated rates would go higher (so watch the June and August meetings carefully.)   Mortgage rates move in tandem with the 10 year treasury
 
so the cost of servicing a mortgage jumped about 10% in a little over 6 weeks (each 1% rise in rates increases the monthly payment by about 10%.)  This could bring a screeching halt to the current housing boom and prick the real estate bubble blown up by the 40 year low in mortgage rates.  Particularly at risk are people who bought the biggest house they could afford on an adjustable rate mortgage.  Still rates have backed up only to the level last seen in June 2002, so no need to panic yet, especially as higher long term rates, combined with lowered money supply growth, reduces the pressure on the Fed to raise short term rates.  Our target for year end 2004 is still 5.25% in the 10 year treasury.
 
Investors typically worry about the impact of higher interest rates on the stock market so here's an update on the Fed model, which determines whether the S&P 500 is under or over valued given current interest rates and forward earnings growth projections.
 
We coded this chart so that when the S&P 500 Actual Value is greater than the Fair Value, it shows as Red, Green otherwise.  This is not a chart you can day-trade off of because the data points are computed quarterly.  Still, what we see is that, until 1998, the Fair and Actual Value held reasonably close together (even on a logarithmic scale, the 1987 bubble and crash is tiny compared to the late '90's bull and bear market.)  Only in 1999 did a huge gap (bubble) open up with Actual Value rising even as Fair Value was falling.  The S&P 500 went to the opposite extreme from mid 2002 till mid 2003, an excellent time to buy stocks.  Even now, with interest rates higher and the S&P 500 up 46% from the October 2002 low, the model estimates that the S&P 500 is undervalued by 40-45%.  So in a rising rate environment, we have to be a little cautious about certain industry groups like REITS, building stocks, and brokerage firms, which are particularly sensitive to rising rates, but in general we should be buying, not selling stocks.
 
Energy Prices
Spot prices for a barrel of oil hit $39.57 this week; given high demand and constriction in supply, oil should be over $40/barrel shortly, and gas at the pump over $2.00/gallon for the summer.  However, since energy as in input into the economy is only half the level of a generation ago, we see a slight uptick in inflation, but no major drag on the economy.  As we calculated recently, given the cost of depreciation, insurance, and maintenance for the average vehicle, gas prices could double from current levels without causing a major shift in American driving habits.
 
It is interesting to speculate on the nature of energy markets 50 years from now.  Oil production in the Middle East is peaking now, and may be dramatically lower 50 years from now.  However, this will not mean the end of the world economy, which uses oil not only for energy production, but also as a feedstock for producing plastics and other industrial commodities.  As energy prices continue to rise, we expect nuclear energy to be revisited, (nuclear currently provides 75% of the electricity of France.)  We also expect continued research into wind power and tidal power (neither is without environmental impact) and in producing oil products from biomass conversion (e.g. ethanol from corn production, composting of garbage.)  We'll see some interesting investment opportunities in the years to come.
 
Presidential Election
At the national level, the race between Bush and Kerry is a statistical tie.  At the state level, it looks like Bush will retain all of the states from the 2000 election, possibly pick up a few more, and will win in the electoral college.  Still the race is a lot tighter than 6 months ago, and investors don't like the uncertainty. 
 
Iraq - War on Terror
Two months ago, the situation in Iraq looked calm and stable.  A month ago, Iraq looked like it would spin completely out of control.  A measure of stability has been achieved in the last few days, but only at the cost of 140 troops in April and 26 so far in May (vs. 52 in March and 20 in February.)  One year after the fall of Baghdad, what has the US learned in the Middle East?
 
In Iraq, no chemical, biological or nuclear weapons have been found, or programs related to their production.  We know these weapons existed when UN inspectors exited the country in 1998, but we don't know whether the WMD were destroyed as Saddam claimed, or were transshipped to Syria and other countries.  About 3,000,000 tons of conventional weapons (that's 300 pounds for every man, woman and child in Iraq) are in the process of being destroyed, but much has fallen into the hands of insurgents.  Also learned, when it comes to "nation building," no good deed goes unpunished.
 
Libya was operating an active nuclear and chemical weapons program in Libya (it was long rumored that Iraq had shipped scientists, money and technology to Libya.)  In return for giving up these programs, sanctions against Libya are being reduced.
 
Iran was much closer to obtaining nuclear weapons than previously thought, in violation of Iran's signature on the non-proliferation treaty.  Iran is still frantically trying to complete this program.
 
Pakistan was bartering nuclear technology all over the Middle East and to North Korea, with "Father of the Pakistan bomb" Abdul Kahn as chief salesman.  Pakistan is at best a diffident ally in the effort to round up Osama bin Laden and other Al Qaeda leaders along the Pakistan/Afghanistan border.
 
UN officials, including the son of Secretary-General Kofi Annan, facilitated the theft of $5-10 billion from Iraq's "Food for Oil" program.  Over 200 primarily French, German, Russian companies, politicians and terrorist organizations benefited from skimming the program.
 
Neither the UN nor allies such as Spain have any stomach for dealing with terrorist attacks.  The UN evacuated its office last summer following a car bomb attack against its offices in Iraq; Spain withdrew its troops from Iraq following the Madrid terror attack.  It doesn't really matter whether the US has the rest of world's goodwill; with the stalwart exception of Great Britain, the US is in the War on Terror by itself.
 
Lastly, the US has learned that its intelligence agencies are woefully inadequate in navigating the seedier parts of the planet.  The 9/11 commission, partisan as it is, revealed that both the Clinton and Bush administrations failed time and again to adequately understand and take action against the Al Qaeda threat.  Even now, the failure of Al Qaeda to launch a follow-on attack in the US has been more a matter of luck than skill.
 
 

Strategy

Companies that are relatively insensitive to interest rates (no debt, don't depend on customer financing) should do well in the current expanding economy.  Interest rate sensitive stocks, (for example, REIT's which are down 15% QTD) might become interesting when rates stabilize at higher levels.  We're also keeping the maturity of fixed investments on the short side.  Our forecast remains 8% rise in the S&P 500 for 2004, so that's a gain of 7.8% from now till year end.  We continue to monitor the world geo-political situation.  The Olympic games and the US presidential nominating conventions look particularly at risk for terrorist action.


Yours sincerely,
David Edwards, President
Heron Capital Management, Inc.
(800) 99-HERON
http://www.HeronCapital.com

The Heron Capital Management client letter is published immediately following quarter end and 1 or 2 additional times per quarter. The views expressed in this letter represent HCMI opinion and strategy as of the date published and can change at any time upon receipt of new information. Data quoted in this letter are from sources deemed reliable, but no guarantee of such data is implied.