Dear Clients and Friends,
We are delighted to enclose a summary of
a survey recently completed by our clients for AdvisorImpact on our behalf.
The purpose of the survey was to assess those factors of our relationship that
are most important to our clients, and also identify areas that our firm should
focus on to improve our service to them.
The survey was sent to all our clients on
board at least 6 months; 41% of those clients participated.
The results were graded on a 1-5 scale,
with 1 indicating “Highly Dissatisfied,” 4 indicating “Satisfied”
and 5 indicating “Highly satisfied.”
Overall satisfaction with the relationship
4.7
Of the 4 factors rated most important to
our clients, in descending order of importance:
Advisory is trustworthy
5.0
Client would refer to friends, family and colleagues
4.9
Calls are returned promptly
4.8
Client is comfortable with plan to meet retirement goals
4.6
Naturally we are delighted that our clients
find us trustworthy, would most likely refer our firm, and are pleased with
our core service. Digging further into other factors we see some areas
of concern and opportunities for improvement.
Client Communications
My calls and e-mails are returned promptly
5.0
Any problems I encounter are resolved quickly
4.8
The frequency with which my advisor contacts me
meets my expectations
4.3
Clients would like, on average, 2.4 portfolio reviews per year
Historically we have told clients that, while
their portfolios are under continuous review by us, we would schedule at least
one portfolio review with the client per year. This review is generally
in December but often accomplished in the course of the year. However,
clients are telling us that they would like more frequent reviews. Accordingly,
we will plan on two reviews per year, usually in June and December – more
often if requested by a specific client. Our clients told us that they
generally prefer telephone consultations (83%) to face to face meetings (17%);
we will differentiate among clients so that they get the review format they
prefer.
Portfolio Performance
The short to mid-term performance (1-5) years of
my portfolio meets my expectations
4.2
My financial advisor takes a pro-active approach
to managing my investments
4.0
These ratings are lower than we’d
like to see, and mirror feedback we’ve been receiving in client meetings
and telephone discussions this year.
It's important to remind clients of our
core investment strategy, which is:
Protect clients’ principal by diversifying broadly across stock market
sectors and individual companies
Emphasize mid-cap companies, which have higher prospective returns than large
cap companies but are not as risky
as small or micro-cap companies
Match or exceed the appropriate benchmark returns (the S&P 500 for all equity
accounts, a blend of the S&P 500 and Lehman Bond Index for balanced accounts)
Minimize the realization of capital gains, and therefore minimize taxes, by
focusing on those companies we expect to hold for at least 5 years
Clients’ expectations of this strategy
have evolved over time. Through the beginning of 2000, clients wanted
us to “swing for the fences” and chase the dot com bubble stocks
(which we didn’t do – thankfully!) From 2000-2003, including
the bear market and the 9/11 attacks, clients were grateful that their portfolios
were down but not out and indeed began making new highs in 2004. In 2006,
clients seem less focused on risk and are more focused on returns. Accordingly,
clients have less patience with us holding stocks that appear from an investment
perspective to be good values, but whose price has not budged, in some cases,
for five years.
Typically, we rebalance a client’s
account at least once every two years back to our model sector allocations,
which usually means taking some profits and rolling the proceeds into new
ideas. Quite a few of our mid-cap picks from years ago have grown into
large-cap companies, which means that while our target large cap allocation is
45-50%, we’re currently at 71% on average across our accounts. So
in 2007, it will be our strategy to realize more capital gains among our large
cap positions, and rolling those proceeds into mid-cap positions. Another
risk management rule that we employ is to automatically sell half of any
position that reaches 10% of an account. We had a couple of large
positions take a dive in 2006 (United Healthcare, for example, on options
back-dating concerns.) Going forward, we intend to adjust that rule to
sell half of any position that reaches 7% of an account.
Clients tend to notice when their portfolio
underperforms the indexes by two points, and but tend to forget when they
outperform (human nature, as it turns out.) When we do inception to date
performance reviews, clients are often surprised that their portfolio has
performed a lot better than clients’ expectations. We are upgrading
our quarterly reporting systems in January 2007, and we’ll be adding
inception to date performance reporting to our client quarterly reports.
Investments Education
Clients are interested in learning more
about:
Estate
planning
60%
Retirement
planning
58%
Charitable
giving
48%
Education
planning
46%
Family
wealth planning
45%
Trust
services
41%
Executive
benefits
37%
Stock
option diversification 33%
We routinely address these topics with
clients as their situation merits. However, we see from the results of
this survey that there is a large unmet need for further education (we were
shocked to learn that 24% of our clients don’t have wills!)
Accordingly, we will start producing bi-monthly “quick takes” on
these topics. Meanwhile, clients should feel free to discuss these issues
with us. If we don’t have the immediate answers, we can help you
frame the question for your lawyers and accountants, or introduce you to a
referral network of estate lawyers and accountants should you need these
services. Fidelity Investments, our custodian, also has a vast array of
information and services that our clients should start taking advantage of, and
we will highlight these options in our “quick take” newsletters.
Overall, we were very satisfied with the
administration of this survey and the information obtained, and we expect to
repeat the process in April 2008. As always, please don’t hesitate
to call with comments on this survey and with other questions and concerns.
The Heron Capital Management client letter is published immediately following quarter end and 1 or 2 additional times per quarter. The views expressed in this letter represent HCMI opinion and strategy as of the date published and can change at any time upon receipt of new information. Data quoted in this letter are from sources deemed reliable, but no guarantee of such data is implied.